Skip to content

The Office

Founding Chair


This instrument defines the office of Founding Chair of the PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation – India, held by Ms. Sri Lakshmi for the inaugural term 2026-27. It states the mandate, the powers withheld, and how each may be checked.

Office holder
Ms. Sri Lakshmi
Term
Inaugural term 2026–27
Nature
Honorary · Non-executive · Unpaid
Appointed
29 August 2026

PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation – India

Ms. Sri Lakshmi

Founding Chair · Inaugural term 2026–27


The Chair convenes the Council, approves everything published in its name, and may refuse.

The mandate

Mandate of the Founding Chair

The mandate is exercised at the level of the Council, not the company. Where a duty requires the Secretariat to act, it acts on the Chair's written instruction.

These eight duties are the whole of the office. Nothing outside them is asked of the Chair, and nothing inside them may be exercised on her behalf.

  1. Duty 1.Set the annual agenda

    Decide, with the Council's members, which questions the Council will take up in the year and which it will decline. The agenda is published, and lists the declined questions alongside the accepted ones.

  2. Duty 2.Convene and chair sessions

    Call the Council's roundtables and chair them, so that the record of each shows disagreement as well as consensus.

  3. Duty 3.Approve publications and write their forewords

    Publication in the Council's name requires the approval of the Chair and a majority of the voting members under Article 12 of the Charter. Her approval is necessary and is not sufficient. Her foreword states what the work establishes and what it does not. She may require changes, delay issue, or refuse issue, and a refusal by her stands without a vote, because a veto needs no majority. For any study involving children the ethics review panel holds a separate veto over publication, which is a power to stop and not a share in the approval.

  4. Duty 4.Represent the Council in public

    Speak for the Council on its agenda. Public representation is on Council subjects only and is never a representation about a product, a price or a purchase. The words she speaks are hers, whoever prepared the briefing.

  5. Duty 5.Appoint the first cohort of Founding Members

    Appoint the first cohort of Founding Members, filling the constituencies the Charter names. That is the one appointment the Chair makes alone. Expert Fellows are appointed thereafter by the Founding Members, and every later member appointment requires their assent. The nomination and invitation list is built from public and professional sources and may not be derived from PrepGraph's commercial records. Each invitation states that membership is unpaid, that it confers no certification and no procurement access, that the membership list will not be used for solicitation, and quotes the Charter: "Membership of the Council does not constitute endorsement of PrepGraph or any technology vendor. Members participate in their individual professional capacity to advance responsible, ethical and evidence-informed use of AI and innovation in school education."

  6. Duty 6.Own the ethics of the research agenda

    Approve the ethics commitments under which any Council research involving schools or children proceeds, and confirm in writing, before fieldwork, that each study meets them. The confirmation is dated and published with the study. It records that every researcher and office-holder on the study has been told in writing that the duty to report under section 19 of the POCSO Act 2012 is a personal legal duty which no Council confidentiality undertaking, consent form or agreement may qualify, and it names the Data Fiduciary for the study under the DPDP Act 2023.

  7. Duty 7.Hold the Secretariat to the independence policy

    Test the Secretariat's conduct against the independence policy and require it to be put right wherever it has drifted.

  8. Duty 8.Decide what the Council will not do

    Refuse work that falls outside the six pillars, that cannot be done well in the time available, or that would place the Council near a procurement decision. Refusals are published with the agenda.

    A small body of credible work is the objective. Volume is not.

The check on the convener

Independence, and how it is enforced


The Council carries its convener's name, so that the relationship is stated on the first line rather than discovered.

The Council's position on vendors is fixed and is quoted in full wherever it is relevant: "The Council does not endorse individual procurement decisions or technology vendors. Its role is to advance responsible AI readiness, educator capability and evidence-based innovation in schools."

The convener's office is held by a named person: Umesh Sharma, Founder & CEO, PrepGraph, holding the Secretariat office of Founder & Executive Convener. The rule that binds the office is set down in the same place: "The Executive Convener may contribute research, evidence and proposals. Council recommendations are determined collectively and are not subject to commercial approval by PrepGraph."

Each safeguard below is drafted so that it can be used against the convener's wishes and so that it survives the end of this framework. Where a clause would otherwise depend on goodwill, the operative words are the deadline, the licence or the waiver.

  • No editorial control for PrepGraph

    PrepGraph has no editorial review. It may correct factual statements about its own systems, within ten working days, and silence publishes. It cannot delay, amend or withhold anything.

  • What the named offices cannot do

    None of the three Secretariat officers holds a vote and none counts towards quorum. The Executive Convener cannot approve, amend, delay or withhold anything the Chair has approved; cannot remove her, shorten her term, or appoint her successor; does not sit on the ethics review panel; and is not present when the Council decides any matter in which PrepGraph has an interest. He may propose an agenda item and the Chair may decline it without giving a reason.

  • Approved text is issued unchanged

    Once a publication is approved under Article 12 of the Charter, the Secretariat's role is production and distribution. It may not amend, delay or decline the approved text, and must issue it within ten working days. If it does not, the Chair may publish that text herself in the Council's name; PrepGraph grants an irrevocable, royalty-free licence for that purpose, surviving the end of her term and of this framework.

    A publication criticising the Secretariat's conduct or PrepGraph's product runs on the same ten working days as any other.

  • The right to say that something was resisted

    If the Secretariat obstructs, delays or dilutes an approved output, the Chair may say so publicly, in her own words, without prior clearance. No confidentiality obligation in this framework or in any other document between her and PrepGraph applies to the conduct of the Council, and PrepGraph waives any claim arising from such a statement. The waiver survives the term.

  • Funding fixed before the work

    The Council's budget for the term is stated in writing before the first meeting and held for the term. It may not be reduced, withheld or made conditional on the content of a finding. Any change requires ninety days' written notice with reasons — the Charter's period, and the only one — notified to members and publishable by the Chair.

  • Separation from commerce

    No Council session, publication or membership list is used as a sales channel. Council contact details are held apart from PrepGraph's commercial systems and are not transferred into them. Nothing said, seen or collected in a Council room is put to commercial use by PrepGraph, and that includes product development, roadmap, pricing and competitive analysis. The annual public record answers this as a yes or no question.

    If a participating school asks about PrepGraph's product, the conversation happens outside the Council, is handled by the commercial function, and is not recorded as Council activity.

  • The standing question

    Each meeting opens with one recorded question: has anything been asked of the Council since the last meeting that served the convener rather than schools.

  • No success-linked payment

    Neither the Chair nor any Council member receives payment or benefit linked to PrepGraph's sales, pipeline, referrals, school sign-ups or valuation.

  • Who drafted it

    Every Council output names its drafter and that person's employer on its first page, alongside its funder and its reviewers with their declared interests. Where a generative AI system was used in drafting, in analysis, or in handling participant data, the output names the system and says what it was used for.

    A body writing rules about AI in schools discloses its own use of it first.

  • Dissent no Chair can stop

    Any member may enter a dissent of up to three hundred words and require it to be published alongside the output it concerns, unedited except for length and law, without the Chair's approval or the Secretariat's.

The office of the Founding Chair

The PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation is a national forum advancing responsible, research-led AI innovation in Indian schools. Its mission is stated in one sentence and is not open to local reinterpretation: "To help build an Indian education system strengthened by responsible, research-led AI innovation — preparing students, teachers and institutions for an AI-enabled future by advancing responsible adoption, educator capability, academic innovation, student safety, research evidence and ethical governance."

Ms. Sri Lakshmi holds the office of Founding Chair for the inaugural term 2026-27, commencing on her acceptance on 29 August 2026. PrepGraph is the founding organisation, research and knowledge partner, and secretariat. The Secretariat schedules, drafts, records and corresponds. It does not decide.

The Chair's counterparts in the Secretariat are named. Umesh Sharma, Founder and Chief Executive of PrepGraph, holds the Secretariat office of Founder & Executive Convener. Rekha Sharma, Chief Operating Officer of PrepGraph, holds the office of Executive Director & Secretary-General. Anisha Sarkar holds the office of Director, Education Partnerships & National Outreach. None of them holds a vote on anything — not on publication, not on standards, not on membership, not on a vendor question — and none counts towards quorum. The rule separating the two bodies is quoted, never paraphrased, wherever they are described together: "The Council determines the recommendations and principles. The PrepGraph-supported Secretariat enables research, coordination, publication and implementation. The Secretariat holds no vote."

The Charter governs. This instrument is subordinate to it and is void to the extent of any inconsistency with it. The Chair does not hold the Council's authority alone. The voting members are the Founding Chair and the Founding Members, and the Charter's principal decisions — what is published, whether the Chair is removed, whether an Article is amended — are taken by them collectively. Where this instrument describes a power of the Chair, it is a power exercised inside that body, not above it.

The distinctions below separate this office from an advisory seat.

  • Whose agenda

    An adviser responds to an agenda set by the company. The Chair sets the Council's annual agenda with its members. The Secretariat may propose items; it may not decide them, and every agenda item records who proposed it.

  • Who chairs the room

    The Chair convenes each session, fixes the question it will address, and approves the invitation list.

  • Whose name is on the record

    A Council publication is approved by the Chair together with a majority of the voting members, under Article 12 of the Charter, and carries her dated written approval and her foreword. Anything issued without that approval is not a Council publication, and the Secretariat must say so when asked.

  • Who may say no

    The Chair may refuse a publication, withdraw the Council's name from an activity, and require the Secretariat to put right a public statement within five working days.

  • Direction of accountability

    An adviser is accountable to the company that appointed her. The Chair is accountable to the Council's stated purpose and holds the Secretariat to it.

The research agenda and its ethics commitments

The Council builds an Indian evidence base on what AI actually does to learning. That is the sixth pillar, and because the convener sells a product in the field to be studied, its rules are the strictest in the Council.

PrepGraph may participate in Council research as a data or platform partner. Where it does, the participation is disclosed on the first page of the study and not in a footnote. Product evidence generated by PrepGraph is never presented as an independent finding of the Council. Where PrepGraph influenced a study's design, the study states how and names who.

The Council does not publish an evaluation of a PrepGraph product funded by PrepGraph. Where the intervention studied is the convener's product, the study is an evaluation of that product whatever it is titled, and the protocol names which product delivered the intervention.

No study begins without the Chair's dated written confirmation that it meets the commitments below, and that confirmation is published with the study.

  • Children first

    Research involving children proceeds only with informed school and guardian consent, an opt-out that carries no penalty of any kind, including no effect on any commercial relationship the school has with PrepGraph, and the minimum personal data the question requires, deleted on a date stated in advance.

  • Questions and methods fixed in advance

    The question, the method, the primary measure and the analysis are recorded and dated before data collection begins, and published with the study. Any departure from that record is listed in the study, so that a disappointing result cannot later be reframed as a different one.

  • Negative results are published

    A study finding no effect, or an adverse effect, is published within ninety days of completion, on the same terms as one finding a benefit. The Chair may direct publication if it is not offered.

  • Disclosure of the convener's role

    Every publication states who funded the work, who collected the data, whose platform was studied, who drafted it and who reviewed it. PrepGraph's only sight of a draft is the factual-accuracy correction on statements about its own systems: no editorial review, ten working days, silence publishes, and no power to delay, amend or withhold.

  • Participating schools see it first

    Schools that took part receive the findings at least seven days before publication. They may correct factual descriptions of themselves. They may not alter the findings, and the study says so.

  • Open publication

    Council research is published in full, with method and limitations, free to read and without registration or email capture, so that reading it does not generate a sales lead.

Support provided to the office, and its limits

PrepGraph provides the support below so that Council work meets a standard the Chair is willing to sign. It is support to the office, not a benefit to the person. Assets created under it belong to the Council.

The support is delivered by the three named offices of the Secretariat, and the direction of that relationship is fixed: the Secretariat serves the Chair. It drafts, convenes and records on her written instruction. This is a service provided to the office. It is not supervision of it, and the Secretariat holds no vote on anything the office decides.

Nothing in this section obliges the Chair to appear anywhere. Every item may be declined, at any time, without a reason.

  • Council profile

    A profile carrying her designation, biography and approved photograph, published alongside the Council's purpose and its non-statutory status.

  • Briefing before any appearance

    Identification of relevant platforms, and, before each appearance, a written note setting out the current state of the question and what the Council can and cannot claim about it.

  • Editorial support

    Research and drafting assistance for Council publications, forewords, articles and interviews on Council subjects. Nothing attributed to her is issued without her written approval of the final text, and approval of a draft is not approval of a later version. Whoever drafted is named on the output, together with their employer, whether or not that employer is PrepGraph.

  • Session materials

    Invitations, agendas and session papers for Council activities, circulated in good time before each session.

  • Travel and logistics

    Travel, local transport and reasonable lodging for engagements agreed in advance, arranged and paid by the Secretariat so that no cost of the office falls on the Chair, and kept separate from any question of remuneration.

  • A named coordinator

    The Secretariat office accountable for scheduling, records and follow-through is the Executive Director & Secretary-General, Rekha Sharma, who may name one further person to carry the day-to-day work. Both are named in writing and reachable at council@prepgraph.com. If either changes, the Chair is told before the change takes effect.

  • On whose instruction

    The Secretariat drafts, convenes and records on the Chair's written instruction, and the instruction is kept with the record it produced, so that anyone can later see who asked for what.

  • What the support does not extend to

    Support is confined to Council business. The Secretariat does not build a personal profile for the Chair, place her in media unrelated to the Council's agenda, or draft material issued under her name on subjects outside the six pillars.

Terms of engagement

The engagement is honorary and non-executive. It creates no employment, agency or partnership, and no office of PrepGraph. The Chair leads the Council; she does not join the company.

The term is twelve months, commencing on her acceptance on 29 August 2026. Whether the office continues beyond the term is decided by the voting members, from nominations, with the Chair's own written agreement; PrepGraph holds no vote and no veto over it. Silence does not renew it.

  • Time

    Roughly four to six hours a month, plus events agreed in advance. If the load exceeds that, the remedy is a smaller programme, not longer hours, and the Chair decides which activities go.

  • What the hours contain

    One agenda and review call with the Secretariat each month, reading and approving drafts, preparing and chairing sessions, correspondence with members she has invited, and the ethics confirmations.

  • Events

    Each appearance is agreed individually. There is no standing commitment to a number of events, no minimum and no target.

  • Renewal and amendment

    Continuation beyond the term is decided by the voting members and requires the Chair's written agreement; PrepGraph holds no vote and no veto over it. This instrument may not be amended during the term without the Chair's written agreement, and may not be amended so as to conflict with the Charter.

  • Records

    Council records are held by the Secretariat, and copies are provided to the Chair within ten working days of a request, during the term and after it.

  • Confidentiality, bounded

    Confidentiality covers PrepGraph's commercial information and the personal data of participants. It does not extend to the Council's conduct, its findings, or the Chair's own account of either.

Compensation

There is no compensation for the office. The Chair receives no fee, salary, retainer, equity, commission, referral payment or success-linked benefit of any kind for holding it. An unpaid Chair is harder to direct, which is the point of the constraint.

Two things sit outside the rule, and both are handled in writing.

  • Expenses

    Actual and reasonable expenses for Council engagements, agreed in advance and either paid directly by the Secretariat or reimbursed against receipts. Expenses are not remuneration and are recorded separately.

  • Specific engagements

    A discrete piece of work outside the mandate, such as a commissioned paper or a keynote requested by a third party, may carry an honorarium. It may not be paid by PrepGraph or by any party with a commercial interest in the Council's work, is agreed in a separate written engagement stating the deliverable and the sum before work begins, and is disclosed wherever the engagement is public.

  • What may never be paid

    No payment, during this term or afterwards, may be linked directly or indirectly to PrepGraph's revenue, pipeline, referrals, school sign-ups or valuation.

    If such an offer is made, it is declined.

Powers the Chair does not hold

The office is bounded. The Chair's authority runs over the Council. It does not run over the company, and it does not run over any school's decisions.

If any person represents otherwise, in a meeting, a proposal or a public statement, the Secretariat puts it right in writing within five working days.

  • No power to publish alone

    She cannot issue a Council publication on her own authority. Approval requires her and a majority of the voting members. Her power over publication is the power to stop, not the power to release.

  • No power to choose her successor

    She does not appoint, nominate or approve the next Chair, and neither does PrepGraph. The succession rules below are not hers to vary.

  • No authority to bind PrepGraph

    She is not a director, employee, officer, shareholder or authorised signatory of PrepGraph, and may not act or be described as one.

  • No signing authority

    She does not sign contracts, proposals, orders, tenders or letters of intent for PrepGraph or for any school.

  • No commercial representations

    She does not quote prices, discounts, commercial terms or delivery commitments, and is not asked to.

  • No commitment of funds

    She does not commit PrepGraph's funds. The Council's budget is proposed by the Secretariat and borne by PrepGraph. Her power over it is the power to refuse an activity, not to spend.

  • No certification, rating or approval

    The Council does not certify, rate or approve schools, curricula or products, and the Chair therefore holds no such power to lend, in this term or in any future arrangement.

  • No procurement role

    She does not recommend, shortlist, introduce or influence any purchase, by any school, of PrepGraph's product or any other.

    A request that she do so is a breach of this framework by the person making it, whoever they are.

  • No data authority

    She has no access to and no control over student personal data, and requires none for the office.

Safeguards the Chair is owed

These are obligations on PrepGraph, exercisable by the Chair. Those marked as surviving continue to bind PrepGraph after the term ends and after this framework ceases to have effect.

  • No obligation to endorse

    She is never required to make, repeat or approve a claim about any product, including PrepGraph's, that she does not independently hold to be true.

  • No obligation to open doors

    She is never asked to influence a procurement decision, arrange a commercial introduction, or make an approach on PrepGraph's behalf. She may decline without giving a reason.

  • Approval over her name and image

    No use of her name, designation, photograph, likeness, voice or words in any publication, advertisement, presentation, proposal or channel without her written approval of that specific use. Approval of one use is never approval of another. This obligation survives the term.

  • The right to decline

    Any appearance, interview, quotation or association may be declined at any time, including after acceptance, and without explanation.

  • No fundraising or solicitation

    She is not asked to raise investment, solicit customers, or lend the office to a commercial pitch.

  • No student personal data

    No access to identifiable student data is required of her, and none is routed to her.

  • Defence of the office

    If the Council's administration is criticised publicly, PrepGraph answers for it in its own name, within five working days. The Chair is not asked to defend the Secretariat's conduct.

  • A clean exit

    Within fourteen days of the end of the term her name, photograph and designation are removed from live channels, and the Secretariat confirms in writing that each has been removed.

    Publications already issued keep her foreword, marked with the term she held.

The Chair's own conflict obligations

Independence is tested in both directions. The Chair makes a written declaration of interests before she first sits, refreshes it annually, and notifies any material change within fourteen days.

The declaration is made to the Reviewer of Concerns, not to the Secretariat, which sees no competitor-relationship data at all. A body that asks schools to disclose discloses first.

  • What is declared

    School, trust and board positions; directorships and shareholdings; paid advisory or speaking arrangements in education technology; family interests in any of the above; and any engagement with a school likely to appear in Council work. A person who is an employee, director, shareholder or paid adviser of any supplier of AI products to schools, or who otherwise derives material income from one, may not hold office as Chair, Founding Member or Expert Fellow and may not vote. Vendor staff may be heard as invited Observers only. PrepGraph is a supplier of AI products to schools and is inside that bar, not outside it.

  • Recusal

    She withdraws from any Council decision, session or publication touching a declared interest, and the record shows who took the decision in her place.

  • The office is not a lever

    The office is not used in her own institutional or commercial negotiations, and is not cited in support of any organisation other than the Council.

  • Third-party payments disclosed

    Any honorarium or hospitality received from a third party for an appearance made as Chair is disclosed within fourteen days.

  • Gifts

    Gifts of more than token value, from any party with an interest in the Council's work, are declined.

Resignation, removal and succession

She may resign at any time, in writing, with or without reason. Thirty days' notice allows commitments to be handed over, but immediate resignation is permitted and will not be contested.

The office may also end without her consent, and the rule for that is the Charter's and no other.

  • Removal

    PrepGraph cannot remove the Chair and cannot end her term early. Removal is by two thirds of the voting members other than the Chair, on grounds stated in writing, put to her with an opportunity to answer before the vote is taken. The grounds, the vote and her answer are published.

  • When the office is vacated automatically

    The office is vacated without a vote on death, on written medical incapacity certified by a registered medical practitioner, or on failure to discharge the duties of the office for ninety consecutive days without leave.

  • Announcement

    A resignation is announced within seven days, plainly and without characterising her reasons. If she supplies a statement, it is published unedited alongside the announcement.

  • Her account is hers

    She may state her reasons publicly at any time. No confidentiality obligation in this framework prevents her from describing the Council's conduct or her own, and PrepGraph waives any claim arising from that account.

  • Withdrawal of name

    Her name, designation and photograph are removed from live channels within fourteen days. Issued publications retain her foreword with her term dates.

  • Succession

    The voting members elect the successor. PrepGraph takes no part in that election and proposes no candidate, and the successor's declared interests are published before the successor takes office.

  • Commitments in flight

    Engagements already accepted may be honoured, transferred or cancelled at her election.

What the role demands

The office is not ceremonial and is not accepted as though it were.

The demands are ordinary and persistent. Drafts read on time. Members invited personally. Sessions chaired well enough that senior people return. Requests declined, some of them from the Secretariat. Little of this is visible from outside, and the visible part is the smallest part.

Each demand below has a control, and the powers in this framework are there to be used.

  • Being used as a door-opener

    Someone may treat an introduction from the Chair as a commercial asset.

    The request is declined. A repeated request is stated grounds for resignation, and this framework says so in advance so that it need not be argued later.

  • Guidance a school can act on

    When a deployment goes wrong anywhere, a body that speaks about responsible AI will be asked what it said.

    The answer is specific, dated guidance that a school could actually have followed.

  • Time

    Four to six hours a month in a steady month, more in a session or publication month.

    The remedy for a heavy month is fewer activities, not longer hours.

  • Questions at her own institution

    Colleagues, boards and peers may ask why she lends her standing to a company's forum.

    The declaration of interests, the absence of any payment, and this framework are the answer.

  • Protections that last

    A company's priorities, funding or leadership can change.

    The publication licence, the confidentiality waiver and the right to state her reasons survive this framework and do not depend on who runs PrepGraph.

How the first year will be judged

Success for this office is institutional quality. Commercial outcomes for PrepGraph are not a measure of the Chair's work, are not reported to her, and are not discussed with her as though they were.

The measures below are set for the inaugural term, and the annual public record reports each by name.

  • A published agenda

    The Council's agenda for the year, set with its members and published, including the questions declined.

  • Members who can say what they did

    A founding membership drawn across the constituencies the Charter names, each of whom can name a specific contribution. Number is not the measure.

  • Work a school could use on a Monday

    Outputs a principal who buys nothing can apply directly: a governance checklist, a question set for reviewing a vendor, or a policy template, published free and without registration.

  • Evidence handled rigorously

    Any research issued states its method, its limitations and its funding, and would survive review by a reader hostile to its conclusion.

  • The independence record

    A complete record of the Council's decisions, with the Chair's refusals and the Secretariat's corrections stated.

  • Interests on the record

    Declarations complete for the Chair and every Founding Member, published on the day each appointment takes effect and updated within fourteen days of any change.

  • Nothing sold in the Council's name

    No procurement recommendation, no shortlist, no endorsement, and no use of Council contacts for solicitation.

  • The annual public record

    The Charter's annual public record, published at the end of the term: what the Council did, what it cost, and what it learnt. There is one such document, under one name.

On the record

The Chair is accountable to the Council's purpose, not to the company that convenes it, and every power in this instrument is written so that she can use it against the convener's wishes.

Public representation

Subjects the Council is convened to address

These are the Council's six pillars, in their canonical order, expressed as the questions a school actually faces. The Chair speaks on them because they are the Council's agenda, not as a personal repertoire.

The public programme for the inaugural term is set by the Chair with the Council's members.

  • Responsible AI in Schools

    What a school should establish before approving any AI tool: what data leaves the campus, who reviewed the tool for age-appropriateness, where a human stays in the loop, and how academic integrity is handled in practice rather than in policy.

    Framed against obligations schools already carry, such as the DPDP Act 2023. Referring to a statute is not a claim of endorsement by anyone, and the Council has no standing under any of them.

  • Teacher AI Enablement

    What teachers need in order to use AI well: what it is reasonable to ask a teacher to learn in one term, which tasks it can genuinely reduce, and how augmentation is distinguished from quiet replacement.

  • Student AI Readiness

    What responsible student use looks like beyond prompting a chatbot: verification, attribution, judgement about when not to use it, and boundaries appropriate to age.

  • Academic Innovation

    Where personalised learning, learning-gap identification and formative assessment genuinely help, where they overpromise, and how differentiated teaching survives contact with a class of sixty.

  • School Leadership & Governance

    What a school should adopt, what it should reject, which policies it needs in place before adoption, and how outcomes should be measured so that the measure survives scrutiny.

  • Research & Evidence

    What the Indian evidence base shows, what a rigorous school-level study looks like, and the ethics of research where children are involved.

The Council's own conduct

Why the Council carries its convener's name, which independence controls it operates under, and what a school should ask of any body that convenes it, this one included.

Why it is listed

This subject is on the agenda deliberately: a body that asks schools for trust answers this question in public.

The six pillars, in full

Founding membership

The Chair invites the founding cohort, and the work is shared from there.

Founding membership is unpaid, confers no certification and no procurement access, and the membership list is never used for solicitation.

Status

The Council is a voluntary, non-statutory initiative. It is not a government, regulatory or accrediting body, and it does not certify, rate or approve schools, curricula or products.

Neutrality

The Council does not endorse individual procurement decisions or technology vendors. Its role is to advance responsible AI readiness, educator capability and evidence-based innovation in schools.

The convener’s other sites